Improving Student Performance in Introductory Accounting - Raising Minimum Grade Standards is Not the Answer
Abstract
An ongoing debate continues at universities surrounding whether or not to raise minimum grade standards. Because of an inherent risk that enrollments may decline as a result, it is important to examine whether minimum grade policies are associated with improved student performance. To address this issue, the current study examines the relationship between higher minimum grade requirements in introductory accounting and student grades. The new minimum grade requirement of “C†was established beginning with the fall 2015 semester for introductory accounting to strengthen the quality of the program for an AACSB application. The research design included modeling introductory accounting grades over a ten-year period to examine any effect of the increase in the minimum grade on students’ grades in the course. The multivariate regression equation considered variables previously found associated with introductory accounting grades (i.e., status as accounting major, grade point average, mathematics preparedness and previous experience taking the course). An additional dichotomous variable was introduced to capture the impact of students on the new program. All students were taught by the same professor, using the same textbook, teaching philosophy and examination format to enhance the comparison. Results suggest average grades in introductory accounting did not improve as expected.Downloads
Published
2022-01-07
Issue
Section
Articles
License
The copyright for articles in this journal are retained by the aithor(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use with proper attribution in educational and other non-commerical settings.How to Cite
Improving Student Performance in Introductory Accounting - Raising Minimum Grade Standards is Not the Answer. (2022). The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 31(1). https://www.aejournal.com/ojs/index.php/aej/article/view/627